To Save Millions of Lives
An Act to Outlaw Medical Lysenkoism
An Act to Outlaw Medical Lysenkoism (Health Equity)
Welcome to another addition in the Praxis Series here at A Path Through. This represents, first, an explanation as to what the problem is, and second, draft legislation meant to be forwarded at any possible level – probably the state is best – in order to put rubber in contact with road. This is where we do our work. It also happens that today’s installment is designed to, literally, save millions of lives.
You may recall the recent catastrophe that befell us recently in the (response to) the Covid pandemic. We suffered under fear, lockdowns, financial difficulties, various scarcity, and deepening divisions for two years. What you almost certainly do understand is that this catastrophe cracked the tyranny door open. What you may not (yet) realize is what sneaked in that door while we were all distracted. While we can’t be sure how many Americans Covid truly killed, I am confident that this new monster will dwarf it by an order of magnitude.
I had my own personal experience with this new monster just a few months back. In January of this year I came down with Covid, and it was extremely unpleasant. I was not critical by any means, but I was quite ill, and, in significant part due to permanent disability caused by the Pfizer vaccine, I was considered high-risk for mortality from Covid.
Just getting properly tested back in January was an ordeal. The instant tests had been largely discarded at that point having been recognized to be unacceptably inaccurate, and the hospital policy did not allow for a rapid PCR test unless the patient was critical. However, somehow, the orders got mixed up and my slow-roll (4 day) PCR test wound up expedited, and I had results almost immediately. Obvious, I was positive.
The doctor, reviewing my medical history, suggested it was imperative I get monoclonal antibodies to lower my risk of a bad outcome, and so he ordered them. However, the hospital I was at was not an administration site (thanks, government regulations), so I would have to go elsewhere to get it, and it would take a day or two.
A day passed with no contact from the administration site(s), so I followed up myself. I was advised that, per their guidance and policies, that I was “not qualified” to receive monoclonal antibodies. They refused to explain why beyond that.
I was hardly the only person around me to become ill at this time. Omicron surged through my social groups and Church – very few people didn’t get it. However, very few of them had more than a mild cold, and most required no professional care. Of those that did require treatment the only one I am aware of that actually received the monoclonal antibodies had only one feature that stood out as a probable reason why: that person could be classified as a “person of color.”
This isn’t just a theory, here. At this time the Biden regime was, through the FDA, pushing down guidance to healthcare facilities on who should be receiving the scarce resource of antibodies, and the guidance contained a scorecard – the higher your score, the higher your priority. On this scorecard things like a significant pre-existing condition would get you a point or two, being a woman (despite men having worse outcomes on average) got you an extra point, but here’s the kicker: being non-white got you a full seven (7) points.
This is “health Equity” in action. “Equity,” as you may know from my prior articles on the subject, is roughly equivalent to Marx’s stage 5 of History: Socialism. This is the period of time in which the government (either a vanguard, or dictatorship of the proletariat), uses force to equalize outcomes along all conceivable lines. Equity = Socialism. “Equity” is why Communists always wind up stacking bodies to the moon in pursuit of manmade Eden.
This should properly scare us all into a state of action. Our medical system already accounts for among the highest premature death count in America due to various problems, but the addition of health Equity to the equation is going to result in millions of deaths. It’s quite likely that hundreds-to-thousands already died just as a result of the Biden regime restricting monoclonal antibodies from red, southeastern states for the stated purpose of “vaccine Equity.”
Subject matter expert James Lindsay describes this phenomenon as “medical Lysenkoism,” after the Soviet pseudoscientist whose communist version of agriculture resulted in the starvation of millions. Dr. Lindsay agrees that the lives of millions of Americans are on the line with this Marxist assault into the medical fields.
So, here I have drafted an act to make it unlawful to treat patients in a manner that considers intersectional group outcomes or statistics, whether present or historical, in determining the treatments, care, or rationing priority of any patient. This is going to get quite technical and difficult from here, but this is necessary to attack and preempt the abuse of language we can anticipate the left will invoke in an attempt to circumvent this.
While a patient will manifest many traits that may be said to be representative of a broader group – man/woman, black/white, adult/child – the patient, him or herself, remains an individual, and it is at this individual level that all patient care, and care considerations must take place.
A patient must be treated as an individual, and in such a manner that is consistent with reasonable industry best practices and is reasonably believed to minimize the mortality and morbidity, and maximize positive physical health outcomes, on an individual basis without regard to race, sex, age, disability, etc. or any immutable or intersectional characteristic.
Medical rationing of any sort, including but no limited to trauma, mass casualty, medications, resources, care, or of any scarce resource must be conducted in a manner only to maximize the positive outcomes of the largest number of patients, and without regard to race, sex, age, disability, etc. or any immutable or intersectional characteristic.
Please consider the below text of the draft bill to be free use, and please consider asking your local reps to introduce the legislation. Specifics, such as recommended sentencing and incorporation of protected groups should be edited or completed as appropriate. Any attribution should be attributed to myself, but none is necessary. For further on my political efforts see www.MikeBelcher4NH.com.
Updated November 10, 2022
The Text
A person is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by not less than a fine of $1,000 and/or 7 days imprisonment if he or she, in his or her capacity as a healthcare provider, withholds care from any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or provides suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality.
A person is guilty of a felony punishable by not less than 5 years imprisonment if he or she, in his or her capacity as a healthcare provider, withholds care from any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or provides suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality, and the patient experiences death or great bodily harm as a result.
A person is guilty of a felony punishable by not less than 5 years imprisonment if he or she, in his or her capacity as a healthcare provider, acts in an affirmatively injurious manner to any patient, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality, and the patient experiences injury as a result.
A person is guilty of felony first degree murder punishable by life in prison if he or she, in his or her capacity as a healthcare provider, acts in an affirmatively injurious manner to any patient, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality, and the patient dies as a result.
The members of the board and relevant officers, owner(s), or partners of any corporate entity are guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by not less than 7 days imprisonment, per incident as implemented by healthcare providers under their direction, if he or she, in his or her capacity promulgating standard operating procedures, rules, or employment expectations, establishes policy, whether writtena or verbally, instructing employees or contractors engaged in patient care to withhold care from any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or provide suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality.
The members of the board and relevant officers, owner(s), or partners of any corporate entity are guilty of assault and battery, punishable by not less than 30 days imprisonment, per incident as implemented by healthcare providers under their direction, if he or she, in his or her capacity promulgating standard operating procedures, rules, or employment expectations, establishes policy, whether written or verbally, instructing employees or contractors engaged in patient care to withhold care from any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or provide suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality, and the patient dies as a result.
The members of the board and relevant officers, owner(s), or partners of any corporate entity are guilty of felony felony manslaughter, punishable by not less than one year imprisonment, per incident as implemented by healthcare providers under their direction, if he or she, in his or her capacity promulgating standard operating procedures, rules, or employment expectations, establishes policy, whether written or verbally, instructing employees or contractors engaged in patient care to withhold care from any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or provide suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality, and the patient dies as a result.
The withholding of care to any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or the provision of suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality shall establish a cause of civil action against all individual(s), entities(s), professional association(s), and accrediting organization(s), providing or withholding aforementioned care, or promulgating standard operating procedures, rules, or employment expectations governing such healthcare providers.
Any professional association, licensing or accreditation agency, union, or other corporate entity promulgating policy, guidelines, requirements, or standards having the effect of promoting or instructing healthcare providers engaged in patient care, or any corporate entity that may establish policy over such healthcare providers, to withhold care from any patient that may be reasonably said necessary or useful in minimizing morbidity or mortality, or provide suboptimal care, due in any part to consideration of group or intersectional identity status or representation, including but not limited to race, skin tone/color, national origin, sex/gender, or sexuality, shall be barred from any state recognized accrediting, certifying, licensing, or education function, and no state funds may be dispersed to such entity for any purpose.