Discussion about this post

User's avatar
SavedByGrace72's avatar

This is interesting and very thought provoking, in a good way. Clearly not all governments are equally disposed to reward good Christian behavior in the same way. Some even condemn it. That will never change as long as there is good and evil in the world. But what matters is how we react: should we revolt (there is a broad spectrum of possibilities in this word from voting to taking up arms) or passively submit when government is against Christ--antichrist. Or to put it another way, how bad must a government be before we conclude that it is not a legitimately ordained by God government? This could be a slippery slope for if we look closely enough at any government there will be points, I think, where Christian liberties will be trounced upon if not down right condemned.

Peter, in a similar context, instructs servants to be submissive, not only to the good and gentle, but also to the unreasonable (1 Peter 2:18). Submission is a good thing as Christ our Lord taught us through His example. However, there are times when, as when Peter and John spoke to the council in Jerusalem, "whether it is right in the sight of God to give heed to you rather than to God, you be the judge..." a Christian must obey conscience more than civil authority. But how exactly that 'disobedience' is to be worked out is a matter for another discussion; but I think unless the government is instructing me to overtly disobey God my best option is to patiently endure, for this finds favor with God. It is why we have been called out according to 1 Peter 2:21.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?