Criminal Intent
A Primetime Confession of Premeditation
Tonight, at eight pm eastern, the ostensible head of the regime is due to speak on the unique threat posed by traditional Americans. Per reports put out by the White House this demented pederast with treasonously deep ties to foreign enemy states is to stand before the American people – a people fully split between irreconcilable worldviews and verging on civil conflict – and name those “MAGA Republicans” as a “threat to our Democracy.”
I cannot say with certitude what specific words he will use beyond that. I don’t know if he will call directly on his side to take to the streets against their neighbors, as multiple prominent Democrats have done, or if his signals will be concealed in initiate language. I don’t know if he will feign appeal to bipartisanship – perhaps by differentiating between Uniparty Republicans and populists – and unity or go straight for the jugular.
While I cannot say for certain what words will escape his scowled maw this evening, I can offer some advice on how seriously you should take it. The answer is this: deadly seriously. There will be an abiding temptation to write much of it off as mere rhetoric, and not real. You will tell yourself he cannot possibly mean what he is saying except in the most strained, charitable interpretation. Offer no charity, for there will be none offered to you. Indeed, he will mean what he says, and it will represent Executive policy of the nightmare variety.
For evidence I offer you a look back in history to when Biden first declared war on his domestic enemies, as I wrote about here. What did Biden say then, what did the federal apparatus echo, and then what did they do? Well, they promised a quasi-direct censorship of regime enemies through public-private partnerships with tech companies and social media. What did we get? Have a look: direct government communications to socials to censor specific persons, words, and topics.
What else did they say about these “domestic violent extremists?” Well, they said they would put Americans on the no-fly list and refuse them firearm background checks even if they are not a prohibited possessor. What did the government go on to do? Take a look: dissidents (bastard though Fuentes may be) on No Fly lists.
What else was promised? They said that there were parts of the internet that were too dangerous for Americans to access, and so they must be prohibited. What did we get?
Trump’s social media platform was just officially denied access to the Google Play store over the content private citizens post on the platform – this comes some time after Amazon Web Services nuked the Parler platform from Orbit just as it was beginning to challenge Facebook/Twitter hegemony.
The point, well-made I think, is that this regime will do what it promises when it comes to persecution, and, further, that it is fair at all times to take the most reasonably, terrifyingly uncharitable interpretation of their statements at face value, because this much is clear: this regime has criminal intent, and designs on your life. They’ve shown it time and time again. They’re building out their public-private army with which to crush us. Don’t shy away. Don’t shirk your responsibility to take them at their word, and to carefully consider the conclusions that follow. Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.








looks like twitter have taken down Eric Scmitt already. dead twitter link.
I have said that Biden was the #1 most divisive president we have ever had. I truly believe it.
As for Truth Social being taken out of the play store, the social site is still available online through their website. So mobile users should still be able to get it in the browser.
But Truth Social should follow Minds' example. They have an app in the store but, I think, it doesn't show comments. There may be some other slight changes. But you can download the real app from their website and when you do it it will let you know when it needs updating. So, unless you have technical problems, you should only have to download it from the site once. I am still so surprised less people use or even know about Minds. There just doesn't seem to be the same publicity that Gab gets even though it's pretty much the same freedom to speak on both.