The firefight rages all around you in the bombed-out apartment block. Dust-tinged sweat dripping from your brow stings your eyes, and as it does you become acutely aware of your narrowed visual field from elevated adrenaline. Your hearing is simultaneously dulled to the waves of small arms fire and sharpened to the words of your squad leader as he hollers, “push left.” You snap your rifle from high ready taking aim on an enemy at 20 meters placing his thoracic region rapidly within your 65 MOA circle reticle as you fire off an aimed pair dropping him at 10 meters – as you follow him down with your rifle your bang goes click instead: your M4 has run dry. You grab for your last magazine at 11 o’clock on your plate carrier, but as you raise it shards of black plastic, spring, and loose ammo go flying as you realize your plate ate a 7.62. Flipping your M4 mag-out to your left side it hangs from your two-point sling as you draw your M17 with your right hand just as the enemy closes to striking distance. You immediately pivot your sidearm down-range on clearing the holster, and as you lurch forward knocking the AK from your enemy’s hands you grab his throat with your left hand. Driving forward you fire five shots from retention to the pelvic girdle, and as you drive into the enemy you fall onto him as he goes down. As the next wave approaches you pick up the AK74 lying next to your enemy, charge it, and take aim with irons out to 150 meters releasing a serious of short, controlled bursts on the squad.
Now, we may not be in a literal firefight at the moment, but we do find ourselves in a war, and amidst a revolution. If we are to fight this war as counter-revolutionaries in the manner which has been presented to us – that of fifth generation, asymmetric, political information warfare – we need to act with the skill of the soldier above. There are many lessons to be drawn from this soldier: on knowing yourself, and how you react under pressure, knowing how to take proper aim, retain your weapons, and, most important for our purposes, that is reasonable, necessary, and perfectly ethical to pick up the weapons of the enemy to use against them.
In the formulation of war we are experiencing these enemy weapons take the form of sociocultural bombs, and political edged weapons. The tools of Marxian conflict theory are brought to bear for the subversion of a population in a divide and conquer manner along lines defined by intersectionality: sex, race, class, indeed any trait could be applied within the dialectic to stoke division. This process is achieved broadly through what we know as “cancel culture,” or, in the original German, “aufheben der kultur.” As previously outlined the function of cancel culture is not to attack a person, but culture itself, as it achieves these means through the narrowing of the range of acceptable opinion around revolutionary Statism by inflicting pain on people, companies, and any entity that resists the narrative. The secret of this type of warfare is that through the control of language, and definitions, thought itself can be brought to heel. In doing this the revolution can be achieved, they hope, without considerable bloodshed.
In reality this situation, undefeated, will go the way all such previous Statist revolutions have gone: fatal catastrophe on an unimaginable scale. These political systems simply cannot be maintained, or stabilized, as they are not in accordance with reality. Indeed, the whole enterprise is a religious cult pursuit built around the deity of Hegel’s “Absolute.” They believe that once they complete the revolution, and achieve a dictatorship of the proletariat (or antiracists, perhaps, as James Lindsay would call it), a literal deity will arise that ushers in the fully-automated, luxury utopia. Admittedly, many don’t actually think that far ahead, but instead simply trust “the experts” to achieve the desired ends. However, it is important to realize that it is the experts themselves who believe in this religious endgame of immanentization, and magical utopia, and so the ones setting the agenda for the left are, indeed, cult zealots.
They will ‘ree’ about the “Absolute” not being literal, and suggest they ditched the metaphysics on adopting dialectical materialism, but that would be like a Christian saying they believe they will go to heaven, but they don’t believe in God. It’s utterly nonsensical, and beyond credulity. They are a cult, their leaders believe in magic, and more than merely believing they are fully banking on the rise of this deity to ensure their little revolution doesn’t wind up killing everyone – they are driving all of society off a cliff with the expectation that at the bottom lies Eden, and not the predictable result of gravity. Alas, the eschaton is not immanentized, the “Absolute” does not rise as written, and everyone who doesn’t go violently dies a slow death of starvation just like every time before. This is why we have no choice but to fight. To choose to sideline ourselves would be, literally, fatalistic. If it must be so I’d prefer to go down swinging. But it’s not yet clear that it must be so anyhow.
So, how do you swing a political knife? How do you lob a sociocultural grenade? You do so by, first, picking up the weapons of the enemy to use against them. “Cancel culture” is a perversion of a natural sociological phenomenon by which cultures maintain norms, traditions, and taboos. Most of those I know would have little difficulty with the idea of prohibiting the inclusion of a pedophile on a rafting trip, or a Church small group (and many of my dear readers are already making woodchipper jokes). This is because we all agree that this behavior is beyond the pale and crosses a bright line. What we must understand is that this bright line of taboo has been shifted, deliberately, over a period of many decades, and by some of the most evil people to ever walk this Earth, such that many bad things are now permissible on our side of the bright line. We must begin to fight back and shift this bright-line of taboo back to the point where it precludes the public acting out of behaviors that undermine culture, separate our minds from reality (thereby upholding pseudoreality), and affect the defeat of traditionalists.
This is where I will remind you once more that this is war, so do not expect it to be a pleasant experience. We must begin to polarize the creeping evils of the left through the direct refusal of relativism: not all cultures, behaviors, religions, nor “ways of being” are equal, and some are downright harmful to us all through the cultural rot they induce in a free society. The first step to this is remoralization: understanding, truly, what is real and good in this world. We must then begin applying the process of “cancel culture,” minus the dialectic, to split the Overton Window, and narrow the range of acceptable opinion in rightist circles to exclude those not in accordance with reality, and utopian, as any healthy society must to enforce taboo. This means a proper application of the Paradox of Tolerance, and, indeed, being publicly, professionally, and, perhaps, even personally intolerant of those pseudoreal utopian things, those espousing them, and all such things that arise from Marxian, and postmodern theory, nihilism, and relativism.
Broadly, we must exercise the aesthetic, in public, of righteous anger towards the lies that they want to force upon us. We must not accept the pseudoreal, nor be passive in in the face of aggression against the real. We must, in fact, terminate associations, and relationships with those who demand fealty to these lies: those true believers who will not be swayed by reason. We must not simply keep our mouths shut and hope to move past it. There is no third way. There is no passive path through this: the prevailing winds are all those of the revolution.
We must acknowledge that we are now two peoples, not a single body of believers in something fundamental. We must fix these truths as the left has done with untruths: through repetition, through confrontation, and by never ever backing down or apologizing (these are two methods of bleeding one of moral authority in order to win an argument without arguing). We either take these uncomfortable actions, or we slowly fade into the ether, smug and confident in our own moral infallibility in the face of the destruction of a nation. Don’t expect that smug sense to comfort you in the presence of wailing children with distended bellys.
I’ll leave you with a little motivation in the brass-tax facts about their intentions (all derived from their own academic literature):
· Critical Race Theory is a Marxian theory designed to radicalize people along racial lines, stoke hatred, promote segregation, and, ultimately, induce race war for Communist revolution. They’ve already succeeded in turning a generation of young, black American men into racially obsessed revolutionaries who poll overwhelmingly in support of hating white people.
· Queer theory is, above all else, designed to sexualize your young children because, broadly, queer theorists would like to have sex with them, or make them have sex with each other while they watch (and film) as an act of “liberation” from parental “oppressors.”
· Gender theory is designed to destroy the categories of sex, and bring about equity in physical intimacy such that people will no longer be allowed to choose their partners, nor refuse sexual advances along certain lines, as true equality of sex means your wife must submit to any man of higher victimization status on request, and you, likewise, must pleasure any “trans” person on demand, to include the fellating of “ladydick.”
· Modern Feminism is designed to develop an induced psychopathology in women, and particularly in straight women, that gives lesbian women, and especially black lesbian women, unfettered sexual access, as they polarize heterosexual sex, and men broadly as a sin against Radical Black Feminist liberation.
· Modern education theory, based in Freire’s Pedagogy of the Oppressed, is, like Mao’s cultural revolution, designed to turn your children into Marxian revolutionary fodder, as it teaches them to hate, murder, and inflict atrocity on the real world to bring about the perfected state in a fight that ensures they will die an ugly death.